Write your opinion...sorta

Do you think classic Quebec literature should be taught to secondary students to help them understand the society in which they live in?

Your options:

Yes, Moderated, or—that's it.
Something smells fishy donnit?

Sincerely, I'm 100% for reading anything and everything, and I strongly believe that literature, even the low quality kind (hemhem-starts with the letter T), is in some way or another enjoyable/insightful/educational. But, it ticks me off when they screw us of our rights, especially when it's about our educational success, so why can't we decide what we write about?
Shit happens when I get ticked off.

So let us begin. (Abridged of course)

For my opinion letter I need to answer this question that you ask of me: Do you think classic Quebec literature should be taught to secondary students to help them understand the society in which they live in?

NO (I state my opinion very clearly), you shitheads (I address my audience), I believe, as explosively as a nuke going off (marqueur de modalité), that classic Quebec literature should not be taught to secondary students to help them understand the society in which they live in. (I make sure I am not off topic by restating it in it's entirety)

It would be wasting valuable time and resources as well as money—the student's. We have potential to be doing so much more with our precious time and already limited resources. Plus, we could use the money to get us what we need to enable use to survive the SAEs, which teach you such things like responsibility, and teamwork by forcing you to answer dumb questions in the same category as "Do bears shit in the woods?" (Don't know about shittin' but they do their pissin' in urinals)(Okay, went slightly off topic, but comic relief is necessary--the ministry people have extremely short attention spans)

In addition, your freaking question is bullshit. (Strong supporting argument. The final stake in their coffin) Classic Quebec literature does not help youth understand present day society because in no freaking bearshit way does Jesuits converting Amerindiens, wood-runners killing beavers, living on a farm, moving to the city, help me understand present day society problems such as the fucking high school drop out rate? or teenage pregnancy? or even how Quebec's education system managed to fuck itself so completely in so little time?

OOOh, I get it, you want us to understand how the English kicked your blue asses 250 years ago, so you feel whupped and still haven't gotten over it, especially with AMERICANISM, IMMIGRATION, and WORLD ECONOMICS raping you some more since then, so we're supposed to accept your illogical, unjust, quasi-childish attempts at preserving your culture/economy and just go along with it.

Seriously, 4 years of subliminal messages and propaganda through history and other classes. Gosh, you fail at being communists too, since clearly, this article isn't praising the Quebec government and bashing the crap out of EVERYBODY ELSE ON THIS FREAKING PLANET.

In conclusion, I'd like to say that we should most definitely NOT be learning classic Quebec literature(Return to the point), but instead, we should be reading more of everything to diversify our culture and understand of the world and society as WE know it, with classic Quebec literature last on the list of priorities because it is as helpful to us as sand in the desert.


Amen.